The Waterkloof “Five” – Exposing the Trial

Waterkloof-four-group-01

Boys will be boys, or so the saying goes. But in the year that Paris Hilton, famous for nothing more than being rich, priviliged, spoilt and arrogant, was arrested for driving under the influence, and her subsequent arrest and 23-day imprisonment in a Los Angeles jail, the actions of five rich, priviliged, spoilt and arrogant afrikaans schoolboys, would make us re-evaluate everything in a different light.

Paris Hilton is an example of the modern phenomenon of the "celebutante", the celebrity who rises to fame not because of their talent or work but because of their inherited wealth and controversial lifestyle.

Paris Hilton is an example of the modern phenomenon of the “celebutante”, the celebrity who rises to fame not because of their talent or work but because of their inherited wealth and controversial lifestyle.

Not since Paris Hilton’s arrest has there been such media attention focused on a case involving youthful offenders. But strangely, unlike the Oscar Pistorius case which were to follow some years later, where every single fact was made known to the media and public, very little is known indeed about the trial of what would become known as “The Waterkloof Four”.
The four Waterkloof boys—known as the Waterkloof Four—were only 15 when they committed the acts that led the Pretoria High Court to convict them of the murder of an unknown black man and of assaulting another man in a field in Pretoria in 2001. They admitted the assault but have consistently denied killing the other, unidentified man.

Paris Hilton and the Waterkloof Four

In September 2006, Hilton was arrested and charged with driving under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.08%.  Hilton's driving license was subsequently suspended in November 2006, and in January 2007 she pleaded no contest to a reckless driving charge. Her punishment was 36 months' probation and fines of about $1,500.

In September 2006, Hilton was arrested and charged with driving under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.08%. Hilton’s driving license was subsequently suspended in November 2006, and in January 2007 she pleaded no contest to a reckless driving charge. Her punishment was 36 months’ probation and fines of about $1,500.

Like Paris Hilton, the Waterkloof boys are privileged and physically attractive. Like Paris, they faced their court appearances in style. Throughout the months of their trial they posed outside the Pretoria High Court decked out in the latest designer fashions. There was something flagrantly provocative and exhibitionistic about their attitude. They were nailed by the media and public who felt that they should have shown more appreciation of the seriousness of the charges. Instead of remorse, they displayed defiance and arrogance.
On the day Christoff Becker (22), Frikkie du Preez (23), Gert van Schalkwyk (22) and Reinach Tiedt (22) reported to start serving their 12-year sentences in Pretoria Central, reporters swarmed to get the best images. Public interest was phenomenal. The pages of Afrikaans papers have been dominated by passionately expressed opinions (mostly strong condemnation, occasionally sympathy) on the case.

Hilton was required to begin her jail term on June 5, and checked herself into the Century Regional Detention Facility, an all-female jail in Lynwood, California after attending the 2007 MTV Movie Awards on June 3.

Hilton was required to begin her jail term on June 5, and checked herself into the Century Regional Detention Facility, an all-female jail in Lynwood, California after attending the 2007 MTV Movie Awards on June 3.

The media reported about the boys’ first day in jail—reminiscent of the attention paid to Hilton’s first day in jail. It was remarked on Larry King Live that the experience would be good for Hilton and boost her career. This is however where the similarities between the Waterkloof Four and Paris Hilton would end. For the Waterkloof Four, the future would never be carefree and bright again.

Whereas the attention paid to the Hilton case triggered public debate about the superficiality of Hollywood’s celebrity culture, the Waterkloof case raises different and deeper questions. It touches the most sensitive nerve in the Afrikaner (and indeed the South African) psyche: racism in its most brutal form.

The Product of their Upbringing

Hoërskool Waterkloof is an Afrikaans high school situated in the eastern suburbs of Pretoria, South Africa. It is known as one of the top schools in Gauteng and has been awarded by the GDE (Gauteng Department of Education)academic school of the year in 2004, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012. It has had a 100% pass rate for the 23 years.

Hoërskool Waterkloof is an Afrikaans high school situated in the eastern suburbs of Pretoria, South Africa. It is known as one of the top schools in Gauteng and has been awarded by the GDE (Gauteng Department of Education)academic school of the year in 2004, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012. It has had a 100% pass rate for the 23 years.

The boys were 15 when the alleged crimes were committed. Many believe that their alleged actions and attitudes reflect on their well-to-do parents as much as on them. Even a mature 15-year-old with a criminal capacity (meaning the ability to appreciate the difference between right and wrong and to act accordingly) is, to a large extent, the product of upbringing and education. The Pretoria suburb of Waterkloof is a symbol of Afrikaner affluence, tradition and gentility. It is therefore ironic that the group is referred to as the Waterkloof Four: if the boys are guilty, their behaviour is the antithesis of the refined culture residents of the suburb claim to promote. If they are not guilty, their actions and attitudes would still be a disgrace to Afrikanerdom.
Hoerskool-Waterkloof-01Dr Mia Swart, a senior lecturer at Wits Law School, explained it as follows: “The actions of the four would taint the reputation of Afrikaners everywhere (from Bloemfontein to London, from Durban to Dubai). Many Afrikaners at that time have not only accepted multiracial democracy but embraced the ideals underlying it; they actively contribute to a better, more equal society. The media attention focused on the actions of the Waterkloof Four, and the proximity in time to the displays of racism at the University of the Free State made these isolated acts seem like common practice and that makes racists of us all.”

It will probably take many decades to work through our collective guilt and the unrepentant attitude of the Waterkloofers set us all back.”

Next Page:  The Events as it unfolded

2 Comments
  1. Excellent post. I am checking this weblog continuously and I’m inspired!
    Very useful information – particularly this article. Thanks and good luck.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *